2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 22409
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
B.LAXMINARAYANA – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 27995/2025
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.27995 OF 2025
29th December, 2025
Between:
B. Laxminarayana
…Petitioner
AND
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary,
Department of Mines & Geology, Secretariat Buildings,
Hyderabad and others
…Respondents
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed declaring the action of the
respondents in not concluding the disciplinary proceedings
against the petitioner arising out of G.O.Rt.No.203, INC(V)
Department, dated 30.12.2024 as arbitrary and illegal and not
considering the case of the petitioner for promotion.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned
Government Pleader for Services-III appearing for respondents.
With their consent, this Writ Petition is taken up for disposal
at the admission stage itself.
##PAGE2##3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner while working as Surveyor in Ranga Reddy
District, a charge Memo was issued to him by the
vide
respondent No.1 G.O.Rt.No.198, Industries and
Commerce (Vigilance) Department dated 30.12.2024
levelling two charges, for which petitioner has submitted his
written statement on 13.02.2025, denying the charges.
However, without considering the same, an enquiry was
ordered, but there is no progress in the enquiry. It is further
submitted that the petitioner is eligible and entitled for
promotion to the post of Supervisor, but the respondents
are not considering his promotion on the ground of
pendency of the said charges. Therefore, petitioner seeks
indulgence of this Court to direct the respondents to
consider his case for promotion to the post of Supervisor in
terms of G.O.Ms.No.257, General Administration (Ser.C)
Department dated 10.06.1999.
4. The learned Government Pleader appearing for the
respondents submits that since the petitioner is facing
departmental proceedings, he is not entitled for promotion,
however, the respondents will consider the case of the
##PAGE3##petitioner for promotion to the post of Supervisor in terms of
G.O.Ms.No.257 dated 10.06.1999.
5. Having regard to the submissions made by the
respective parties and without going into the merits of the
matter, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the
respondents to consider the case of petitioner for promotion
to the post of Supervisor in terms of G.O.Ms.No.257,
General Administration (Ser.C) Department dated
10.06.1999, as and when promotion takes place. There shall
be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Writ
Petition, shall stand closed.
_____________________________________
NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO, J
Date: 29.12.2025
Note:
Issue C.C. by 05.01.2026
B/o.NIT
##PAGE4##81
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.27995 OF 2025
Date: 29.12.2025
Note:
Issue C.C. by 05.01.2026
B/o.NIT