IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY,THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
Pendyala Ramesh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
WP 15596/2019
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT YDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
W.P.No.15596 of 2019
Date: 29.12.2025
Between:
Mr.Pendyala Ramesh
… Petitioner
And
Union of India, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Ministry of
Finance (Economic Affairs), New Delhi and others.
…Respondents
ORDER : (per Hon’ble Sri Justice P.Sam Koshy)
Heard Ms.K.Udaya Sri, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and
Ms.B.Sapna Reddy, learned Standing Counsel representing Ms.J.Sunitha, learned
Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department, for respondent Nos.2 to 6
and perused the record.
2. The instant is the Writ Petition which has been filed by the petitioner
seeking an appropriate direction from the High Court by way of Writ of
Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for
entitlement of receiving reward as per the Income Tax Informants Reward
Scheme (for short “the Scheme”).
3. According to the petitioner, it was based upon the information that the
petitioner had made available with the Department, the Department was able to
recover huge amount of tax from certain individuals who had acquired illegal
assets and evaded tax. After recovery was made, the petitioner has been pursuing
with the Department so far as his claim for the reward under the Scheme since
##PAGE2##2
2015 onwards. Learned counsel for the petitioner referred to a representation that
the petitioner had made initially on 02.03.2015 and subsequently on 11.07.2017
and on 04.12.2017. In addition, learned counsel also referred to the Department
letter dated 02.02.2018 (Annexure P.32), wherein, the claim petition of the
petitioner has been forwarded by the authorities to the Higher authorities in the
Department, but, till date it has not been processed and scrutinized. Therefore,
the present writ petition was filed in the year 2019 and is pending consideration
before this Court.
4. Even today, when the matter is taken-up, learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that the petitioner has not been made aware of the outcome of decision by
the Department on his representation dated 11.07.2017 and 04.12.2017, all which
is also referred to in the letter by the Income Tax Department dated 02.02.2018.
5. Given the fact that the petitioner’s representation has been forwarded by
the concerned income Tax officer to the Principal Director of Income Tax (Inv.),
Hyderabad, vide letter dated 02.02.2018 and no further decision has been taken
on the same, we are of the considered opinion that no fruitful purpose would be
served in keeping the Writ Petition pending rather than ends of justice would met,
if, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Income Tax Department,
particularly, the Principal Director of Income Tax (Inv.), Hyderabad, to consider
and decide the claim of the petitioner which stood forwarded by the Income Tax
Officer (H.Qrs) (Tech.), Office of the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income
Tax, Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, dated 02.02.2018. Let the petitioner also
##PAGE3##3
in terms of the correspondence made by Income Tax Officer, dated 02.02.2018
approach the Principal Director of Income Tax (Inv.), Hyderabad, in respect of
his claim who in turn shall decide his claim strictly in accordance with the
Scheme that was prevailing on the date when the petitioner is said to have
forwarded the necessary information, based upon which, according to the
petitioner there were huge recoveries made by the Income Tax Department.
6. Let a copy of the order passed by this Bench in the present Writ Petition
be made available by the petitioner along with his claim petitions to the Principal
Director of Income Tax (Inv.), Hyderabad, within a period of fourteen days.
Let appropriate steps be taken by the Principal Director of Income Tax (Inv.),
Hyderabad, within the outer limit of three months thereafter.
7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order
as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.