IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI
Eesam Sravanthi – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 39819/2025
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI
WRIT PETITION NO.39819 OF 2025
DATED : 24.12.2025
Between
Eesam Sravanthi
... Petitioner
AND
The State of Telangana
Represented by its Principal Secretary,
Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department,
Secretariat, Hyderabad and 6 others
... Respondents
O R D E R
This Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief:
“…to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one
in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the candidature
of Respondent No. 7 as invalid due to deliberate non-
disclosure of the criminal history in column no. 3 and 4 of the
nomination document in absolute violation of the Rule 8(3) of
the Telangana Panchayat Raj (Conduct of Elections) Rules,
2018 and Sections 33, 33A and 125A(ii) of The
Representation of the People Act, 1951 alternatively, declare
the inaction of the Respondent Authorities herein in
considering the representation of the Petitioner herein in
##PAGE2##W.P. No.39819 of 2025
2
recounting of the polled votes as illegal, arbitrary and
unconstitutional and in violation of Rule 60 of the Telangana
Panchayat Raj (Conduct of Elections) Rules, 2018 and
consequently direct the Respondent Authorities to recount the
votes polled in the election conducted for the post of
Sarpanch of Anantaram Gram Panchayat, Julurupadu
Mandal, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District and pass…”
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government
Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, appearing for
respondents No.1 & 3, Sri G. Vidya Sagar, learned Senior Counsel
representing Sri P. Sudheer Rao, learned Standing Counsel for State
Election Commission, appearing for respondent No.6, learned
Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing for respondent No.2 & 5
and Sri K. Pradeep Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Gram
Panchayat appearing for respondent No.4.
3. The petitioner claims to be one of the contestants for the post of
Sarpanch of the concerned Gram Panchayat and that he has secured 262
votes as against the successful candidate, i.e., respondent No.7 herein,
who secured 263 votes. It is submitted that initially the petitioner was
declared as elected, but subsequently respondent No.7 was declared as
elected. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, respondent
##PAGE3##W.P. No.39819 of 2025
3
No.7 was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment for an offence
under Section 302 of IPC, but the same was not disclosed by him in the
declaration submitted along with the nomination form. Therefore, it is in
violation of the Election Rules and therefore, there should be direction
for disqualification of respondent No.7 as Sarpanch of the concerned
Gram Panchayat. The petitioner claims to have submitted a written
representation dt.18.12.2025, bringing the above submissions to the
notice of authorities and requesting recounting of votes pertaining to the
elections for the post of Sarpanch in respect of Anantaram Village,
Julurupadu Mandal, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District. The grievance of
the petitioner is that the said representation has not been considered by
the official respondents. The petitioner is therefore seeking a direction to
the official respondents to conduct recounting of votes and to grant such
other relief.
4. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State Election
Commission, has forwarded a copy of the Circular dt.21.05.2018,
according to which, if any false information is given or information is
suppressed in the declaration form filed along with the nomination
papers, it is an offence under Section 177 of IPC read with Section 195
of Cr.P.C., 1973 and a prosecution can be allowed. He further relied
##PAGE4##W.P. No.39819 of 2025
4
upon the Circular No.170/TSEC-PR/2018, dt.21.05.2018 issued by the
Telangana Election Commission, wherein it is prescribed that where self
declarations have been filed in complete form, then the nomination
should not be rejected by the Returning Officer on the sole ground that
the information furnished in th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.