IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
The United India Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
A. Srinivas – Respondent
MACMA 578/2019
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
M.A.C.M.A.No.578of 2019
DATE: 23.12.2025
Between:
United India Insurance Company Limited.
….. Appellant
AND
Sri A. Srinivas and one another.
….Respondents
JUDGMENT:
This appeal is filed by the appellant-Insurance Company
under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the
judgment and decree dated 23.08.2018 passed in M.V.O.P.No.569
of 2015 by the Chairman,Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-II
Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar
(hereinafter referred to as “the Tribunal”), whereby the Tribunal
awarded compensation of Rs.1,49,000/- together with interest @
7.5% per annum to be payable by the driver-cum-owner of the
crime vehicle and the appellant-Insurance Company jointly and
severally, for the injuries sustained by the respondent No.1 herein/
claimant in a motor vehicle accident.
##PAGE2##2
2. The brief facts of the case are that on 17.08.2014 at about
01.30 P.M., the injured and his brother were proceeding from
Hyderabad to Kongara Kalan Village on Bajaj Stunner motorcycle
bearing No.AP-25-DB-6297 and when they reached near Bus Stand
of Kongarakalan Village, a Bajaj Pulsar motorcycle bearing No.AP-
29-BL-3162 (hereinafter referred as ‘crime vehicle’) driven in rash
and negligent manner with high speed, dashed the motorcycle of the
injured from opposite direction, due to which, they fell down on the
road and the injured sustained bleeding injuries on right thigh,
chest, right leg fingers and injuries all over the body. Immediately
after the accident, the injured was shifted to Jeevan Hospital,
Champapet, Hyderabad where he was admitted as an inpatient for
approximately 11 days and in addition to surgical intervention for
the fracture, he received medical treatment for his injuries and
incurred substantial medical expenditure. On receipt of the
complaint, Police, Ibrahimpatnam Police Station, registered a case
in Crime No.328 of 2014 for the offence under Section 338 of IPC
against the driver of the crime vehicle. The injured filed the
aforesaid claim petition before the Tribunal, under Section 166 of
Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 claiming compensation of Rs.5,00,000/-.
3. Before the Tribunal, the owner of the crime vehicle remained
ex parte. The appellant-Insurance Company filed a counter denying
##PAGE3##3
negligence on the part of the rider of the crime vehicle and
challenging the maintainability of the petition on various grounds,
including non-joinder of necessary parties i.e., owner of the Bajaj
Stunner motorcycle bearing No.AP 25 DB 6297, which was also
involved in the accident, non-production of a valid driving license by
the rider of the crime motorcycle, and alleged breach of policy
conditions. The Insurer also denied liability to pay compensation,
contending that the policy conditions were contravened and prayed
to dismiss the claim petition.
4. The Tribunal, on appreciation of the oral and documentary
evidence, held that the accident was caused due to rash and
negligent driving by the rider of the crime vehicle and awarded
total compensation at Rs.1,49,000/- directing the respondents
therein i.e., the owner and the insurer of the crime vehicle to pay
the same with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of petition
till realization.Aggrieved by the same, the present appeal is filed by
the insurance company.
5. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant-
Insurance Company contended that the Tribunal erred in granting
compensation, since the rider/driver of the crime motorcycle was
in a drunken state and driving without a valid driving licence,
thereby breached the terms of the insurance policy and disentitled
##PAGE4##4
to statutory compensation; the Tribunal improperly assessed
income, loss of earnings, pain and suffering, and future expenses;
since the driver/owner of the crime vehicle violated policy
conditions, the insurance company ought not have been held
liable, and the claim ought to have been dismissed in entirety.
6. On
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.