IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
Kanaparthi Chaya – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 37612/2025
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
WRIT PETITION No.37612 OF 2025
Dated 23rd DECEMBER, 2025
Between:
Kanaparthi Chaya.
…Petitioner
AND
The State of Telangana,
Rep. by its Principal Secretary,
Panchayati Raj Department,
Secretariat, Hyderabad and 3 others.
… Respondents
O R D E R :
This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, is filed seeking the following relief:
“…to issue Writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of WRIT
OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of respondents in not considering
the representations dated 20-02-2024, 06-04-2024, 20-02-2025, 30-05-
2025 and not paying the terminal benefits of late K.Nageswara Rao and
not fixing and paying family pension to the petitioner due to death of her
husband K.Nageswara Rao (Pension payment order No.10-S-007194), as
illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice direct the
respondents to consider the applications/representations dated 20-02-
2024, 06-04-2024, 20-02-2025, 30-05-2025 of petitioner and determine
the terminal benefits as well full pension of late K.Nageswara Rao and fix
and pay family pension along with all arrears of terminal benefits,
pension and family pension, and to pass…”
##PAGE2##2
2. Heard Sri Manoj Kumar, learned counsel representing Sri
Sreenivasa Rao Velivela, learned counsel for the petitioner; learned
Government Pleader for Services-II for respondent Nos.1 and 2;
learned Government Pleader for Services-I for respondent No.3; and
learned Government Pleader for Services-III for respondent No.4.
With their consent, this Writ Petition is taken up for disposal at
admission stage itself.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner’s
husband served as Superintending Engineer, RWS Project Circle (PR),
Kakinada, and retired from service on 30.06.2004 on attaining the
age of superannuation. It is further submitted that the petitioner’s
husband expired on 02.02.2024 due to ill-health. As such, the
petitioner submitted a representation to respondent No.2 on
20.02.2025 requesting the grant of family pension and release of
pensionary benefits pursuant to the demise of her husband.
However, no action has been taken by respondent No.2 so far.
Therefore, learned counsel prays this Court to direct respondent No.2
to consider the representation dated 20.02.2025 submitted by the
petitioner and release family pension and pensionary benefits, within
a time-frame to be stipulated by this Court.
##PAGE3##3
4. Learned Government Pleader appearing on behalf of respondent
Nos.1 and 2 fairly submits that respondent No.2 will consider the
petitioner’s representation dated 20.02.2025 and pass appropriate
orders, in accordance with law.
5. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for
the respective parties and without going into the merits of the case,
this Writ Petition is disposed of, directing respondent No.2 to consider
the representation dated 20.02.2025 submitted by the petitioner and
pass appropriate orders thereon, strictly in accordance with law, as
expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four (4) weeks
from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate a
copy of the decision to the petitioner.
Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition,
shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
_____________________
PULLA KARTHIK, J
Date : 23.12.2025.
TMK
##PAGE4##4
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
WRIT PETITION No.37612 OF 2025
Date : 23.12.2025.
TMK
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.