IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
Sri. Mangesh Sridhar Ekale – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 39317/2025
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.39317 of 2025
THE 22nd DAY OF DECEMBER 2025
Between:
Sri Mangesh Sridhar Ekale.
…Petitioner
AND
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary,
Transport (Roads and Buildings) Department,
Transport Wing, Secretariat, Hyderabad & four others.
…Respondents
ORDER:
Heard Sri A.Manikanta, learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned Assistant Government Pleader for Transport appearing for
the respondent Nos.1 to 5 and perused the entire material
available on record.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner filed the writ petition seeking to declare the action of the
respondent No.5 herein in seizing petitioner’s Motor Car (LMV)
##PAGE2##2
bearing Red.No.MH-12-RF-2970 in pursuant to Vehicle Check
Report No.310962, dated 03.12.2025 for plying in Telangana for
more than one (1) month and demanding to pay Telangana State
Life Tax, as illegal and arbitrary.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue
involved in this Writ Petition is squarely covered by the order
passed by this Court in W.P.No.10877 of 2025 dated 13.10.2025
and requested to pass similar order in this Writ Petition.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Transport did not
dispute the submission made by the learned counsel for the
petitioner with regard to the disposal of W.P.No.10877 of 2025
dated 13.10.2025 and requested to pass appropriate orders.
5. In view of the submissions made on both sides and for the
reasons mentioned in W.P.No.10877 of 2025 dated 13.10.2025,
this Court is of the considered view that the principle laid down in
Ramnath Arumugam Vs The Regional Transport Officer,
Hyderabad, Unreported orders of this Court in, the respondents cannot demand the petitioner to
pay Life Time Tax on the ground that the subject vehicle was kept
in the State of Telangana for more than one month. Moreover, as
per Section 47 of the M.V.Act, if the vehicle is kept beyond 12
months, the vehicle has to be re-registered in the particular place.
WP.No.19141 of 2015 dated 09.12.2024.
##PAGE3##3
In the instant case, the respondents nowhere mentioned that the
vehicle was kept in Telangana State beyond twelve months. In
view of the same, the impugned Vehicle Check Report No.310962,
dated 03.12.2025 is liable to be set aside and the respondents
have to release the subject vehicle to the petitioner.
6. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of by
setting aside the impugned Vehicle Check Report No.310962
dated 03.12.2025 and directing the respondent authorities to
release the vehicle of the petitioner i.e. Motor Car (LMV) bearing
Red.No.MH-12-RF-2970 forthwith.
7. The Registry is directed to annex copy of the order in
W.P.No.10877 of 2025 dated 13.10.2025 along with this order.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition,
shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
______________________
JUSTICE K.SARATH
Date: 22.12.2025
Note: Issue C.C by 23.12.2025
(B/o)
spk
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.