IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 1593 of 2025

17^th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025

Between:

Mr.Gugloth Shankar, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

…petitioner

AND

Mr.T.Anil Kumar, Bhadradri Kothagudem District and another.

…respondents

ORDER:

Heard Mr. S. Pradeep Kumar, learned counsel for the revision

petitioner and Mr.P.Rama Sharana Sharma, learned counsel for the

respondent. Perused the record.

2. This Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the Order dated 17.12.2024 passed in E.P. No. 45 of 2024 in O.S. No. 87 of 2023 by the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge at Yallandu, wherein, the attachment of salary of judgment debtor i.e., revision

petitioner herein, was ordered.

3. The Civil Revision Petition is filed on the singular ground that the E.P. is not maintainable before a Civil Court as the judgment debtor is a resident Agency area. In that regard, Rule 35 of the A.P. Agency Rules, 1924, has been relied upon by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner. The said rule is extracted and produced below:

Rule 35 of the A.P. Agency Rules, 1924:

“Where it is sought to execute within the Agency tracts a decree