SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 23207

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
Yenagandula Mahender – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

WRIT PETITON No.37361 OF 2025

Dated 16th DECEMBER, 2025

Between :

Yenagandula Mahender.

…Petitioner

AND

The State of Telangana,

Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department,

Secretariat, Hyderabad and 2 others.

…Respondents

O R D E R :

With the consent of both the parties, this Writ Petition is

taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:

“…to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more

particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not considering the petitioner for selection to any of the Group-III posts mentioned in Notification No.29/2022 dated 30.12.2022 though he is within the zone of selection under General/ BC-A category with General Rank of 561

with Hall ticket No.2296412029 on the ground that petitioner obtained B.Com Degree from Acharya Nagarjuna University through distance mode during the years 2017-2019 as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and in violation of Articles 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top