IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT YDERABAD

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

Civil Revision Petition No.3144 of 2025

Date: 12.12.2025

Between:

Mr.B.Narayana …Petitioner

AND

Mr.B.Sanjay Kumar and others. …Respondents

ORDER

Heard Chavidi Ramanand, learned counsel for the petitioner; 2. The instant Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227

of Constitution of India assailing the order dated 16.07.2025 in

I.A.No.586 of 2025 in O.S.No.406 of 2003.

3. Vide impugned order, the learned Trial Court has dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner/defendant No.6 under Order 18 Rule 17 read with Section 151 CPC seeking recalling of PW.1 and DW.1 for cross examination and reopening the evidence.

4. Perusal of the impugned order would go to show that learned Trial Court itself has taken due consideration of the same and have reached to the conclusion that the DW.1s chief evidence is over and for cross examination, an Advocate Commissioner has already been appointed and therefore, there is no need for recalling the evidence of DW.1. The defendant No.6 – petitioner would have all the rights to cross-examine the witness before the Commissioner.

5. So far as PW.1 is concerned, the trial