IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
B.Narasimha Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Sri Devi Reddy Nagireddy – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
C.R.P. No.3029 of 2019
10th December 2025
Between:
Sri B.Narasimha Reddy
…Petitioner/defendant No.2
AND
Sri Devi Reddy Nagireddy and another. …Respondents/plaintiff-defendant No.1
ORDER :
This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioner under Article
227 of the Constitution of India, assailing the docket order dated 11.11.2019 in O.S.No.1564 of 2013 passed by the Special Sessions Judge for Trial of Cases under SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989-cum-VII Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, (for short, ‘the trial
court’)
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are hereinafter referred to as they are referred to as in the trial Court.
3. Vide the impugned order, dated 11.11.2019, the learned trial Court passed the following order:
“Learned commissioner filed the Memo stating that the learned defendant No.2 counsel refused to cross examine the DW1 by stating that at the first instance the plaintiff has to cross examine. But as per the procedure the defendant No.2 has to cross examine Dw1 and therefore, the learned commissioner is directed first proceed with cross examination
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.