SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 24000

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
M/s. Harsha Developers – Appellant
Versus
Ahmed Hussain – Respondent


HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

****

THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NOs.3661 AND 4016 OF 2025

DATED: 05.12.2025

Between :

M/s. Harsha Developers.

…Petitioner

Versus

Ahmed Hussain,

S/o Late Tasadduq Hussain and 15 others.

…Respondents

Mr. P Venkat Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in

CRP.Nos.3661 and 4016 of 2025.

COMMON ORDER:

1. Civil Revision Petition No.3661 of 2025 has been filed against an order dated 29.08.2025 passed in I.A.No.237 of 2022 in O.S.No.276 of 2016 by the Court of the III Additional District Judge,

Ranga Reddy District, L.B. Nagar (‘Trial Court’).

2. By the said impugned order, the Trial Court allowed I.A.No.237 of 2022 filed by the respondent Nos.1 to 3/plaintiffs for condoning the delay of 1414 days in filing I.A.No.236 of 2022 seeking restoration of the Suit. The respondent Nos.1 to

3/plaintiffs’ Suit had earlier been dismissed for default on 15.03.2018 pursuant to the plaintiffs’ non-appearance and failure to file evidence and to deposit process fee.

3. By the impugned order, the Trial Court allowed the plaintiffs’ IA (237 of 2022) on the ground that the plaintiffs had shown sufficient cause for condoning

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top