HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

****

THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA

AND

THE HON’BLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO

I.A.NO.2 OF 2025

IN/AND

FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.174 OF 2025

DATED: 03.12.2025

Between :

Garimella Krishna Mohan alias Garimella Krishna,

S/o. Late Ramdas Bhaskara Garimella.

…Appellant

Versus

Rajiva Garimella alias Garimella S Rajeeva,

D/o. S. Satyanarayana Rao.

…Respondent

Mr. S. Raghu Ram, learned counsel representing Ms. K. Sridevi, learned counsel

appearing for the appellant.

Mr. K. Jagadeeshwara Rao, learned counsel appearing for the respondent. COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya

1. The appellant seeks condonation of delay of 35 days in filing

of the present Family Court Appeal.

2. Paragraph No.5 of the IA (in both the IAs. filed before the Division Bench) states that the prayer is for condonation of delay of

76 days. The reason given for the delay consists of the appellant’s health condition during the relevant period. The second reason is that the appellant was unable to contact his counsel to provide necessary instructions for filing an Appeal. The third reason is that the appellant was explained by counsel that there is a potential