SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 24732

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
BOTIKE ERRA JAMPAIAH – Appellant
Versus
BOTIKE KATTAIAH – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2172 OF 2016

Date: 28.11.2025

Between:

Botike Erra Jampaiah

…Petitioner

AND

Botike Kattaiah

…Respondent

ORDER:

Heard Sri G.Anandam, learned counsel for the revision

petitioner. None appears for the respondents, though notices were served on the respondent and also on the counsel appearing for the

respondents before the trial Court.

2. This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of

the Constitution of India, against the Order I.A.No.4 of 2016 in I.A.No.127 of 2015 in O.S.No.68 of 2015 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, at Narsampet, Warangal District, dated 19.02.2016. wherein, the petitioner herein, who is defendant in the suit bearing O.S.NO.68 of 2015, filed I.A.No.4 of 2016 in I.A.No.127 of 2015 under Order 26 Rule 9 of CPC seeking to appoint an Advocate

Commissioner. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein are referred to as petitioner/plaintiff and the respondent/defendant as before the trial Court.

3. The petitioner/plaintiff filed suit against the respondent seeking permanent injunction against the respondent in respect of the land admeasuri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top