SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 24757

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
Shailesh Shailesh Kumar Mandal – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India – Respondent


HON’BLE MRS. JUSTI CE SUREPALLI NANDA

WRI T PETI TI ON No.12748 OF 2022

ORDER:

Heard Sri Mohd. Mumtaz Pasha, learned counsel

appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Sri M. Prudhvi Raj, learned counsel representing Sri R. Mangulal, learned Standing Counsel for Central Government, appearing on

behalf of the respondents.

2. The petitioner filed the writ petition seeking the

following relief

“…to issue a writ, order or directions more particularly writ of mandamus to declare the orders of the 3rd respondent dated 29.10.2019 in proceeding No.11014 (1)/Appeal/SKM-BDL(B)/SZ/L&R/2019 in conforming orders of the 4th respondent dated 16.06.2015 in Proceeding No.V-15014/ CISF/BDL(KB/B)/DISC/ MAJ-01/ SKM/2015/3145 in removing the petitioner from service, is illegal and against to the principles of law, consequentially to set aside the orders of the 3rd respondent in conforming the orders of 4th respondent and to reinstate the petitioner

in service with all other service benefits and pass...”.

3. The case of the petitioner in brief as per the averments made in the affidavit filed by the petitioner in

support of the present Writ Petition is as under:-

The petitioner was appointed as Constable in CISF in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top