SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 24890

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
Musunuru Kishore Babu – Appellant
Versus
Musunuru Shayaji Rao (Late) – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

24th day of November, 2025

Between:

Musunuru Kishore Babu

...Petitioner/Plaintiff

and

1.Musunuru Shayaji Rao (late) died

2.Musunuru Lakshmikanthamma and 4 others.

...Respondent/Respondent

COMMON ORDER

Since these Civil Revision Petitions are arising out of the

same O.S, between the same parties, they are being heard together

and disposed of by way of this common order.

2. Heard Sri Aravind Maturi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri M.Karthik, learned counsel representing Sri D.Madhava Rao, learned counsel for respondents. Perused the

material on record.

3. The C.R.P.Nos.7166 and 7181 of 2018 are filed assailing the orders dated 26.10.2018 in I.A.Nos.1575 & 1576 of 2018 in O.S.No.9 of 2013 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court-cum- VI Additional District Judge, Khammam (for short, the ‘trial Court’).

4. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner/plaintiff filed a suit in O.S.No.9 of 2013 on the file of learned Judge, Family Court-cum-VI Additional District Judge, Khammam, seeking relief of partition and separate possession of the suit schedule property. On behalf of the plain

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top