SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 24891

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
Boinpally Chandrashekar – Appellant
Versus
Boinpally Laxmirajam – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT

HYDERABAD

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA

CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3625 of 2025

This the 21st day of November, 2025

Between:

Boinpally Chandrashekar.

…Petitioner

AND

Boinpally Laxmirajam and three others.

…Respondents

ORDER:

Heard G. Madhusudhan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner

and Sri K. Venumadhav, learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3.

Perused the entire record.

2. The Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioner/plaintiff aggrieved by the order dated 30.07.2025 passed in I.A.No.136 of 2025 in O.S.No.109 of 2023 (Old O.S.No.181 of 2014) passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge-cum-Assistant Sessions Judge at Metpalli (‘Trial Court’), wherein a petition filed under Order XXIII Rule 3 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, to record the compromise between the petitioner and respondent No.1/defendant No. 1, with respect to part of the suit

schedule properties has been dismissed.

3. The background facts leading to the filing of the suit are that the petitioner is the son of respondent No.1 and respondent No.2 is the younger brother of the petitioner and respondent No.3 is the wife of respondent No.2 and respondent No.4 is the mot

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top