SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 25678

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
SMT. N. UDAYASREE – Appellant
Versus
N. NARASIMHA – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

ORDER:

The present Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the

petitioner/defendant under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order, dated 09.03.2015 passed in I.A.No.1338 of 2014 in O.S.No.555 of 2014 by the VIII Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at

L.B.Nagar, (for short ‘the impugned order’).

2. Vide the impugned order, the trial court after going into the merits of the case and considering the entire oral and documentary evidence placed by the petitioner/defendant has dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner/defendant under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short the C.P.C.), seeking to reject the plaint as barred by the Benami

Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988.

3. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner herein is the defendant in the suit i.e., O.S.No.555 of 2014 filed by the respondent/plaintiff claiming that he is in possession of suit schedule property which is said to have purchased by him vide document No.10732 of 2000, dated 13.12.2000, 1873 and 1874 of 2022, dated 05.03.2002, in Sy.Nos.1, 2, 3, 4, 25 & 26, situated at Miyapur Village, Boduppal Gram Panchay

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top