SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 25881

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
M.B.Rajashekar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


HON’BLE MRS. JUSTI CE SUREPALLI NANDA

WRI T PETI TI ON No.14021 OF 2023

ORDER:

Heard Sri Arvind Kumar Kata, learned counsel

appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I I , appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2 and Sri. K. Pradeep Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for TS Zilla Parishads,

appearing on behalf of the respondent No.3.

2. The petitioner filed the writ petition seeking the

following relief

“…to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one

in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS:-

(a) By declaring the entire action of the respondents, in not regularizing the services of the petitioners and not declaring probation in the cadre of Typist and also not releasing periodical increments and other allied benefits, despite of possessing B.Tech (Computers) as well as Office Automation Course, on the untenable ground that, the petitioner did not acquire typewriting qualification mentioned in the orders of appointment other way issuing impugned Memo.No. PRRD-MZET/1/29/2021- dated 19.07.2022 by the 1st respondent and consequential show cause notice No.A1/Estt/2023 dated 10.04.2023 by the 3rd respondent (which is not implemented as to toda

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top