SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 26133

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
Pulicherla Sarojana – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana and 2 others – Respondent


HON’BLE MRS JUSTI CE SUREPALLI NANDA

WRI T PETI TI ON No.45563 of 2022

ORDER:

Heard Sri G.V.L. Murthy, learned counsel appearing

on behalf of petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2, and Sri Pradeep Reddy Katta, learned Standing Counsel for TG ZPP, appearing on behalf

of respondent No.3.

2. The petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer

as under:

“…to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the impugned proceedings Rc.No.B4/ 265/ 2019 dated 06/04/2021 issued by the 3rd respondent whereby rejecting the claim of the petitioners seniority is illegal and contrary to Rule.33 of TS Subordinate Service Rules, 1996 and set aside the same and consequently declare that the seniority of the petitioner is to be determined from the date of assuming the promotion as the Senior Assistant i.e., 26/03/2011 according to Rule.33 with all

consequential benefits and pass...”.

3. The case of the petitioner, in brief, as per the averments made by the petitioner in the affidavit filed by the petitioner in support of the present writ petition is that the petitioner applied for the post of Junior

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top