SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 26438

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
PAMIREDDY CHINNA RAMI REDDY – Appellant
Versus
PAMIREDDY MANOHAR REDDY – Respondent


HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

JUDGMENT:

This Second Appeal is filed challenging the judgment and

decree, dated 30.12.2024, passed by the V Additional District Judge, Bhodhan, in A.S.No.36 of 2019, where under and whereby the judgment and decree, dated 13.11.20219 passed by the Senior Civil

Judge, Bhodhan, in O.S.No.39 of 2014 was confirmed.

2. The appellants herein are plaintiffs and respondents are defendants, before the trial Court. For convenience, hereinafter the

parties are referred to as they are arrayed in the suit.

3. The brief facts of the case as narrated in the plaint are that plaintiff filed a suit in O.S.No.39 of 2014, seeking declaration that the plaintiffs are the owners and possessors of the schedule property. In the plaint it is averred that plaintiffs 1 and 2, the 1st defendant and one Late P.Prabhakar Reddy are the sons of late Pamireddy Venkata Reddy and late P.Gangamma. The 2nd and 3rddefendants are the legal heirs of P.Prabhakar Reddy, the 4th and 5th defendants are the sisters of

the plaintiffs and the 1st defendant. Though all originally belong to Dokiparru village of Gudlavalleru Mandal of Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh State, after death of plai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top