IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
Parlapalli Venkata Ramana Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 39478/2025
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.39478 of 2025
THE 24TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025
Between:
Parlapalli Venkata Ramana Reddy.
…Petitioner
AND
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary,
Revenue (Stamps and Registration) Department,
Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and (3) others.
…Respondents
ORDER
Heard Sri K.K.Mahender Reddy, learned counsel for the
petitioner, Smt. S.Sravanthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader
for Stamps and Registration appearing for the respondents and
perused the entire material available on record. With their consent,
this Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission itself.
2. The case of the petitioner is that he filed an application before
the respondent No.3 on 08.12.2025 stating that he has fulfilled all
requirements for validating the Agreement of Sale dated 27.12.1998,
requesting validation of the same as per the provisions of the Indian
Stamp Act, 1899 (for brevity, “the Act, 1899”). It is the further stated
that similar issue fell for consideration in a batch of Writ Petitions
##PAGE2##2
vide common order dated 28.02.2023 in W.P.No.42908 of 2022 and
batch and this Court, after elaborate discussion regarding Chapter
IV, particularly Sections 35, 40, 41 and 41A of the Act 1899, held
that the Registrar or the officer or person entitled to receive evidence
is under an obligation to collect the deficit stamp duty along with
penalty. While referring to the said provisions, this Court allowed
the said batch of Writ Petitions, directing the respective District
Registrars/Sub-Registrars to receive the subject documents and
process them for collection of deficit stamp duty with or without
penalty, depending on facts of the case under the provisions of
Chapter IV of the Act, 1899. The process was to be completed within
a period of four (4) weeks from the date of presentation of such
documents by the respective petitioners. In view of the same,
learned counsel requested this Court to allow the Writ Petition also.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps and
Registration appearing for the respondents submits that the State
has not filed any appeals against the common order dated
28.02.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.42908 of 2022 and
batch and the said order has attained finality. Learned Assistant
Government Pleader has also not disputed that the facts of the
present Writ Petition are squarely covered by the common order
dated 28.02.2023 passed in W.P.No.42908 of 2022 and batch. In
##PAGE3##3
view of the same, learned Assistant Government Pleader requested
this Court to pass appropriate orders.
4. In view of the aforesaid submissions made by both sides, this
Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the common order dated
28.02.2023 in W.P.No.42908 of 2022 and batch and for the reasons
alike.
5. The Registry is directed to annex a copy of the common order
in W.P.No.42908 of 2022 dated 28.02.2023 along with this order.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition,
shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
________________________
JUSTICE K.SARATH
Date: 24.12.2025
spk
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.