##PAGE1##

1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT

HYDERABAD

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI

WRIT PETITION No.721 OF 2018

DATE :24.12.2025

Between:

Smt. Kunduri Pushpaleela

…Petitioner

AND

The State of Telangana and 5 others

…Respondents

ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed with the following relief:

“…to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more

particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus

declaring the in action of the respondents No. 2 to 4 who

did not implementing the orders of the Hon ble Civil court

pleased to pass on 22-07-2015 in E.A.No.45 of 2015 in

E.P.No.321 of 2015 in O.S.No.559 of 2005 on the file of

Hon’ble Pd. Jr. Civil Judge as per my requisition dated 12-

12-2017 as well as the undertaken given by the 4^th

respondent before the Hon’ble Lokayukta is as illegal,

unjust, arbitrary, violative of Art. 21, principles of natural

justice, and consequently direct the respondents No. 1 to 4

to oblige the Hon’ble Court orders with great and due

respect as their bounded and part of the duty whenever the

Hon’ble Court specifically given directions in this regard as

per my representation dated 12-12-2017...”

2. Heard Sri G. L. Narasimha Rao, learned counsel appearing

for the petitioner and Mr. D.Pradeep, learned Assistant

2

Government Pleader for Home, appearing for respondents No.1 to

4.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

respondent Police authorities have failed to extend police

protection despite specific orders passed by the Execution Court

on 22.07.2015 in E.A. No.45 of 2015 in E.P. No.321 of 2015 in

O.S. No.559 of 2005, on the file of the Principal Junior Civil

Judge, Warangal. He further submits that the cause of action

continues to subsist and prays that appropriate directions be

issued to the respondent Police to extend necessary police

protection whenever the petitioner approaches them for

implementation of the orders passed by the Execution Court.

4. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home

submits that, as per written instructions, pursuant to the

petitioner’s representation dated 12.12.2017, police aid was

indeed extended. He further submits that the Police accompanied

the petitioner whenever he visited the site and observed that no

construction activity was taking place there. In view of these

circumstances, he prays for passing appropriate directions.

5. I have perused the material available on record.

6. The specific grievance of the petitioner is that the

respondent Police authorities have failed to comply with the

3

directions issued by the Execution Court regarding the provision

of police protection. However, the explanation offered by the

learned Assistant Government Pleader indicates that the Police

authorities have already extended such aid in accordance with

the orders of the Executing Court and that the said order

continues to remain in force.

7. In view of the above, this Court considers it appropriate to

direct the respondent Police to extend necessary police

protection/aid to the petitioner, as and when required, in terms

of the order passed in E.A. No.45 of 2015 in E.P. No.321 of 2015,

arising out of O.S. No.559 of 2005, on the file of the Principal

Junior Civil Judge, Warangal, subject to pendency of the E.P. and

any final order therein.

8. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

__________________

N.TUKARAMJI, J

Date: 24.12.2025

hk