SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 26771

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
SRI. QAZI ABDUL NASEER – Appellant
Versus
Sri. QAZI MALIK ABDUL GAFFAR – Respondent


IN THE COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1140 of 2025

22ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025

Between:

Sri Qazi Abdul Naseer

…Petitioner/respondent No.1/defendant No.1

and

Sri Qazi Malik Abdul gaffer and another …Respondents/Plaintiff/defendant No.2

ORDER:

1. Heard Mr. Shaik Ahmed Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner/respondent No.1/defendant No.1. In spite of service of notice on respondents, there is no representation on their

behalf. Perused the record.

2. This Civil Revision petition is preferred aggrieved by the Order passed by the learned XXII Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad (for short ‘the Trial Court’) in I.A.No.200 of 2024 in O.S.No.2762 of 2017, dated 08.01.2025, wherein, a petition filed by respondent No.1/plaintiff under Order VII Rule

14 (3) of CPC to receive (10) documents has been allowed.

3. In grounds of revision, it is pleaded that respondent No.1/plaintiff sought to introduce new pleadings to the suit which was beyond the scope of the original suit. Further, the documents are filed at a belated stage though they were well within the knowledge of respondent No.1. Further, no reasons are given f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top