IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
Vemula Ganapathi – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 38392/2025
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
WRIT PETITION No.38392 OF 2025
Dated 22nd DECEMBER, 2025
Between:
Vemula Ganapathi.
…Petitioner
AND
The State of Telangana,
Rep. by its Principal Secretary,
Schedule Caste Development Department,
T.S. Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and 4 others.
… Respondents
O R D E R :
With the consent of both parties, this Writ Petition is
taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:
“…to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in
the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the
respondents in not regularizing the petitioner services
retrospectively on completion of five years of service in terms of
G.O.Ms.No.212 Finance and planning FW PC III Department
dated 22-4-1994 is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional apart
from violation of principles of Natural Justice and consequently
direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for
regularization of his services retrospectively on completion of
five years of continuous service in the department w.e.f. 1-3-
1988 for the purpose of pension and pensionery benefits by
following the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in case
##PAGE2##2
of B.Srinivasulu Vs. Nellore Municipal Corporation in Civil
Appeal No.6318 of 2015 dated 17-8-2015 and the Judgment of
this Hon’ble Court in WP No.33936 of 2011 and batch dated
2-5-2018 with all consequential benefits and pass…”
3. Heard Sri A.Malhar Rao, learned counsel for the
petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Services-III
appearing for the respondents.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner was initially appointed as a daily wage worker on
01.03.1983 and his services were subsequently regularized
vide proceedings dated 20.01.2010 as a Class-IV employee in
the last grade service in the post of Cook. Consequently, after
rendering 42 years of service, the petitioner retired from
service on 30.06.2025 upon attaining the age of
superannuation. It is further submitted that in similar
circumstances, the erstwhile High Court of Judicature at
Hyderabad, vide order dated 02.05.2018 in W.P.Nos.33936 of
2011 and batch, has directed the authorities concerned to
extend the benefit of the judgment in B.Srinivasulu &
others v. The Nellore Municipal Corporation represented
by its Commissioner, Nellore District, Andhra Pradesh
and Others (delivered in Civil Appeal No. 6318 of 2015, dated
##PAGE3##3
17.08.2015) to the petitioners therein by reckoning their
services from the date of completion of five years, on or before
25.11.1993 for the purposes of their pension and pensionary
benefits. However, in the present case, the services of the
petitioner were not regularized. As such, learned counsel
prays this Court to permit the petitioner to submit a
representation to the respondents for redressal of his
grievance and to direct the respondents to consider the same
and pass appropriate orders in the light of the judgment of
the Hon’ble Supreme Court in B.Srinivasulu (supra) and the
order dated 02.05.2018 in W.P.Nos.33936 of 2011 and batch,
within a time-frame to be stipulated by this Court.
5. Learned Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the
respondents submits that on receipt of representation from
the petitioner, the respondents will consider the same and
pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law.
6. Having regard to the submissions made by learned
counsel for the respective parties, this Writ Petition is
disposed of, permitting the petitioner to submit a
representation for redressal of his grievance within a period of
##PAGE4##4
one (1) week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
Upon receipt of such a representation, the respondents are
directed to consider the same, in the light of the judgment of
the Hon’ble Supreme Court in B.Srinivasulu (supra) and the
order dated 02.05.2018 in W.P.Nos.33936 of 2011 and batch,
and pass appr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.