IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT

HYDERABAD

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

WRIT PETITION No.24939 of 2025

DATED 15.12.2025

Between:

Emani Dhana Laxmi

...Petitioner

AND

The State of Telangana,

Rep. by its Principal Secretary,

Department of Tribal Welfare, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar,

Telangana Secretariat at Hyderabad and six others.

...Respondents

ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed i) to declare the action of

respondent No.1 in not granting stay in M.A.No. _____ of 2025 (un-numbered) in Revision Petition No. _____ of 2025 (un- numbered), which was filed on 30.07.2025; ii) to grant stay of all further proceedings, including eviction of the petitioner from the house bearing H.No.7-1-302/5, Adarsh Nagar Area, Manuguru Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District in

pursuance of the proceedings in LTR Case No.49 of 2023/MNGR, dated 18.07.2024 passed by the 3^rd respondent and CMA No.58 of 2024, dated 17.06.2025 passed by the 2^nd respondent; and iii) to direct respondents not to evict the petitioner from the scheduled property till the disposal of the revision filed by the petitioner before the 1^st respondent.

2. Heard Sri T.Vasantha Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Tribal Welfare Department, for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and learned Government Pleader for Revenue for respondent No.7. Perused the record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed a revision petition dated 30.07.2025 before respondent No.1 challenging the appellate order dated 17.06.2025 in CMA No.58 of 2024, which confirmed the original order dated 18.07.2024 passed in LTR Case No.49 of 2023/MNGR. He further submitted that initially the revision petition was unnumbered and no stay was granted. However, it is now submitted that the revision petition has been numbered i.e., C.No.1158/TW.LTR/2025 and is pending adjudication before respondent No.1.

4. In view of the fact that the revision petition is now numbered and pending consideration before respondent No.1, this Court is of the opinion that the inaction of the 1^st respondent in not granting interim relief is unjustified.

5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents not to take any further steps to evict the petitioners or take possession of the property until the revision pending before the 1^st respondent is finally decided. The 1^st respondent is further directed to consider the petitioner’s stay application and pass appropriate orders on the revision and stay petition, strictly in accordance with law, within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In the meantime, status-quo existing as on today shall be maintained by both the parties with regard to the subject property. No costs.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________________________ JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA Date: 15.12.2025 dgr