IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HON’ BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

WRIT PETITION No. 33703 of 2025

05^thDecember, 2025

Between:

Mohammed Yakub Pasha

… Petitioner

AND

1. Union of India, and Others

… Respondents

ORDER:

The case of the petitioner, precisely as per the writ affidavit, is that he

availed loans and credit facilities from respondents No.3 to 5 (who are Banks, and financial institutions), and he has been promptly repaying by borrowing from others, and he did not make the last few payments to the respondents No.3 to 5; and the petitioner is in difficult situation in meeting the expenses. While so, it is the grievance of the petitioner that the representatives/agents of respondents No.3 to 5are continuously calling, and intruding into the house of the petitioner and threatening him to repay the loans, and that the procedure adopted by the respondents No.3 to 5 is not as per the RBI Guidelines for recovery of loans, and therefore the petitioner seeks a direction to the

respondents No.3 to 5 to follow due process of law for recovery of loans.

2. Counter affidavit has been filed byrespondent No.4-Shriram Finance, essentially contending that the petitioner has