SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 27436

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
Ambati Yadagiri – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 37138/2025



IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

WRIT PETITION NO.37138 OF 2025

THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND

TWENTY FIVE

Between:

Ambati Yadagiri.

…Petitioner

AND

The State of Telangana,

Rep. by its Principal Secretary,

I & CAD Department,

Secretariat, Hyderabad, and

2 others.

…Respondents

O R D E R :

With the consent of both parties, this Writ Petition is taken

up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:

“…to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the

nature of writ of ‘Mandamus’ declaring the action of the respondents in not sanctioning the Pension & Pensionary benefits to the petitioner who was retired from service on 30-04-2025 AN as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unreasonable, contrary to law and against principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to sanction

Pension & Pensionary benefits to the petitioner immediately duly considering the representation of the petitioner dated 25-08-2025 in the interest of justice and to pass…”

3. Heard Sri D.Rama Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Services-I for the respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed as a Full-Time Contingent Night Watchman on 26.06.1991 and, after rendering 34 years of continuous service, he was retired from service on 30.04.2025. As such, the petitioner submitted a representation to respondent No.3 on 25.08.2025 requesting for grant of pension and other pensionary benefits for the 34 years of service rendered by him. However, no action has been taken by respondent No.3 so far. Therefore, learned counsel prays this Court to direct respondent No.3 to consider the representation dated 25.08.2025 submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders within a time-frame to be stipulated by this Court.

5. Learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that the petitioner was not a regular employee and therefore, he is not entitled to pension or pensionary benefits.

However, since the representation dated 25.08.2025 is pending consideration, respondent No.3 will pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law.

6. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the respective parties and without going into the merits of the case, this Writ Petition is disposed of, directing respondent No.3 to pass appropriate orders on the representation dated 25.08.2025 submitted by the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate a copy of the decision to the petitioner.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

____________________ PULLA KARTHIK, J Date : 04.12.2025.

TMK

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top