SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 27579

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
Annapuri Kondal – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HON’ BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

WRIT PETITION No. 29674 of 2025

02nd December, 2025

Between:

Annapuri Kondal

… Petitioner

AND

1. The Union of India, and Others

… Respondents

ORDER:

The case of the petitioner, precisely as per the writ affidavit, is that he

availed loans and credit facilities from respondents No.3 to 12 (who are Banks, and financial institutions), and he has been promptly repaying by borrowing from others, and he did not make the last few payments to the respondents No.3 to 12; and the petitioner is in difficult situation in meeting the expenses. While so, it is the grievance of the petitioner that the representatives/agents of respondents No.3 to 12are continuously calling, and intruding into the house of the petitioner and threatening to repay the loans, and that the procedure adopted by the respondents No.3 to 12 is not as per the RBI Guidelines for recovery of loans, and therefore the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents No.3 to 12 to follow due process of law for

recovery of loans.

2. Counter affidavits have been filed byrespondent No.7-Ugro Capital Ltd., and respondent No.10-Shriram Finance, con

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top