SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 27592

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH,THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.M. MOHIUDDIN
M/s. PEDDI LINGAMURTHY AND SONS – Appellant
Versus
The Joint Commissioner – Respondent
WP 36572/2025



IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI APARESH KUMAR SINGH

AND

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.M.MOHIUDDIN

WRIT PETITION No.36572 of 2025

Dated: 02.12.2025

Between:

M/s. Peddi Lingamurthy & Sons

…Petitioner

and

The Joint Commissioner (Appeals),

Appellate Authority,

Secunderabad-Hyderabad CBIC, Telangana,

And three others.

…Respondents

ORDER:

Learned counsel Sri G.Durga Charan appears for the

petitioner.

Sri Dominic Fernandes, learned Senior Standing

Counsel for Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs,

appears for respondent No.1.

Sri Sai Akarsh, learned Assistant Government Pleader representing Sri Swaroop Oorilla, learned Special Government Pleader for State Tax, appears for respondents No.2 and 3.

Sri B. Mukherjee, learned counsel representing Sri N.Bhujanga Rao, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India, appears for respondent No.4.

2. The petitioner has assailed the order-in-appeal dated 09.09.2025 (Annexure P.1) by which the appeal filed by the petitioner was rejected on the ground of delay as it was submitted beyond the time limit prescribed for preferring an appeal under Section 107(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner has also assailed the order-in-original dated 29.12.2023 for the tax period

2017 - 2018.

3. Learned Senior Standing Counsel for Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs appearing for respondent No.1 submits that the appeal filed by the petitioner was dismissed on the grounds of delay beyond 90 + 30 days condonable period. The petitioner has a remedy of appeal before the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal as per circular dated 24.09.2025 between 01.02.2026 and

30.06.2026.

4. Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, as the petitioner has an effective remedy of appeal against the impugned order-in-appeal, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal within the stipulated window period for filing the appeal with statutory pre-deposit. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

APARESH KUMAR SINGH, CJ G.M.MOHIUDDIN, J

02.12.2025 vs

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top