IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
Rachapelli Linga Swamy – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 36152/2025
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
WRIT PETITION No.36152 of 2025
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief:- “…to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 2nd Respondent in rectifying the mistake advertently committed by the 4th Respondent in recommending Pattadar and Possessory columns in the Revenue Records in effecting the changes through Bhoo Bharathi concerning our land admeasuring Ac.4.00 Gts., in Survey No266/1/12 of Husnabad Village and restore the names of the petitioners therein immediately and consequently direct the 4th respondent not to interfere into the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner property without following due process of law in the
interest of justice …”
2. Heard Mr. C.A.R.Seshagiri Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs.Snehitha, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Assignment appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4. Perused the
record.
3. With the consent of both the parties, this writ petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his grandfather namely Rachapelli Yellaiah was assigned an extent of Ac.4.00 in Survey No.266/1/11 of Husnabad village and Mandal (subject property for brevity) in the year 1970 and after his expiry the petitioner’s father namely one Komuraiah was in ownership and possession of the subject property. He further submits that the petitioner’s father has made an online TM33 Application on 15.09.2025 vide Bhubharati Ref No.2500128889 for passbook data correction in respect of subject property. Pursuant to the same, no action has been taken. Accordingly seeks to pass appropriate direction. 5. Mrs.Snehitha, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Assignment on instructions would submit that grandfather of the petitioner has executed a form of Razinama/Relinqhishment during the period 1993-95 and it was accepted by the then Mandal Revenue officer, Husnabad Mandal. But the name of the said assignee has been continued as pattadar due to non-implementation of the relinquishment deed though the said person was not in actual possession. During the field enquiry and verification of the records it came to the notice of MRO that name of petitioner’s grandfather is entered in online portal though he got no land in Survey No.266 at Husnabad town. Therefore, the petitioner’s grandfather’s name has been deleted from the portal and has been entered as houses/house sites in Dharani/Bhu-Bharati portal in view of the existence of houses in the said land. Thus, the petitioner has got no right over the said property and accordingly, would seek to dismiss the writ petition.
6. Having regard to the submissions of both the learned counsel and upon considering the material available on record, this Court is inclined to dispose of the Writ Petition by directing respondents to examine the TM33 Application dated 15.09.2025 vide Bhubharati Ref No.2500128889 for passbook data correction in respect of subject property and pass appropriate orders, strictly in accordance with law, by issuing notice to the petitioner and all interested parties and afford them sufficient opportunity of hearing, as expeditiously as possible and communicate the same to the petitioner.
7. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________________
JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
27th November, 2025 PSW
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.