THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

WRIT PETITION No.33468 OF 2025

ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed to issue a writ, order or direction

more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in trying to forcibly evict the petitioner from the land to an extent of Ac.11.20 guntas in Sy.No.126/165 situated at Pandurangapuram Village, Palvancha Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District basing on the order dated 25.10.2024 passed in LTR Case No. 23/2021/PVC passed by the 3^rd respondent and subsequent dismissal order passed by the 2^nd respondent in CMA No. 73/2024 dated 28.06.2025 while the Revision Petition filed by the petitioner is subjudice before the 1^st respondent as highly illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice consequently, direct the respondents 2 to 4 not to take any coercive steps including eviction of the petitioner from the land to an extent of Ac 11.20 guntas in Sy.No.126/165 situated at Pandurangapuram Village, Palvancha Mandal, Bhadradri

Kothagudem District.

2. Heard Sri Paaidipalli Chaithanya, learned counsel for the petitioner, and learned Government Pleader for the Social Welfare Department, for respondent Nos.1 to 7. Perused the record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed a revision petition dated 14.07.2025 before respondent No.1 challenging the appellate order dated 28.06.2025 in CMA No.73 of 2024, which confirmed the original order dated 25.10.2024 passed in LTR Case No.23 of 2021/PVC. He further submitted that initially the revision petition was unnumbered and no stay was granted. However, it is now submitted that the revision petition has been numbered i.e., R.P.No.1059/TW.LTR/2025 and is pending adjudication before respondent No.1.

4. In view of the fact that the revision petition is now numbered and pending consideration before respondent No.1, this Court is of the opinion that the inaction of the 1st respondent in not granting interim relief is unjustified.

5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents not to take any further steps to evict the petitioner or take possession of the property until the revision pending before the 1^st respondent is finally decided. The 1^st respondent is further directed to consider the petitioner’s stay application and pass appropriate orders on the revision and stay petition, strictly in accordance with law, within a period of six (6) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________________________ JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA Date: 26.11.2025 BV