SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 28054

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
Bhukya Gangadhar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY

ORDER : (ORAL)

Heard Mr. Y. Bala Murali, learned counsel for the petitioner,

and learned Standing Counsel for Municipal Corporation, appearing

for respondent No.2.

2. This Writ Petition is filed to declare the inaction of respondent Nos.2 and 3 in demolishing the unauthorized compound wall allegedly constructed by respondent No.4 in Plot situated in Sy.No.272/2, Kothapalli Haveli, Karimnagar Municipal Corporation, Division No.17, Karimnagar, which stands in the name of Smt. Ragi Vajramma, in spite of issuing show cause notice dated 23.10.2025 by

respondent No.2, as illegal and arbitrary.

3. Learned Standing Counsel for Municipal Corporation, appearing for respondent No.2, furnished written instructions and submitted that on complaint of the petitioner, Show Cause Notice, dated 23.10.2025 was issued to respondent No.4 seeking explanation as to why the unauthorized construction of compound wall shall not be demolished, within seven (7) days. Respondent No.4 submitted his

explanation stating that his paternal aunt, Smt. Ragi Vajramma inherited agricultural land in Sy.No.272/2 to an extent of Ac.5-00 gts, situated at Kothapalli, Karimnagar and some

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top