IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
THE GENERAL MANAGER KARIMNAGAR DIST – Appellant
Versus
T.PRABHAKAR RAO KARIMNAGAR DIST AND ANR – Respondent
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.5613 OF 2016
ORDER:
This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the revision
petitioner/JDR-2 under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, being aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Peddapalli, in E.P.No.22 of 2010 in E.P.No.46 of 2001
in O.P.No.18 of 1989.
2. Heard Sri P.Sri Harsha Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Singareni Collieries Company Limited for the petitioner and Sri Vedula Venkata Ramana, learned Senior Counsel representing
M/s Bharadwaj Associates for the respondents.
3. The main grievance of the revision petitioner before this Court is that the learned trial Court erred in allowing the decree holder to re-open the calculation of amounts and adjusting the amounts already paid from the date of taking possession of the land, whereas in this case, the possession was taken prior to 4(1)
notification.
4. Further, the main grievance of the petitioner is that the learned Executing Court did not consider that the company had
deposited the comprehensive amounts under the interim order,
consisting of interest, costs and principal amounts stipulated under the provisions of Land Acqui
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.