SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 28217

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN,THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
T.LATHA – Appellant
Versus
T.KISHORE KUMAR – Respondent
FCA 230/2013



AND

FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.230 OF 2013

JUDGMENT

:(per Hon’ble Sri Justice K.Lakshman)

Heard Sri V. Nageswara Rao, learned counsel for the appellant

and Sri E. Purna Chandra Rao, learned counsel representing Sri Soma

Venkateswarlu, learned counsel for the respondent.

2. Feeling aggrieved by the order, dated 30.04.2013, passed in F.C.O.P.No.1738 of 2010, by the Judge, Additional Family Court, at Hyderabad, the present appeal is preferred by the respondent/wife

therein.

3. The husband has filed the aforesaid application against the appellant/wife seekind dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty and the said application was ordered on 30.04.2013. Feeling aggrieved by the said order, appellant wife preferred the present

appeal is filed.

4. During the pendency of the present appeal both the appellant and the respondent have settled the dispute out of the Court and they have reduced the terms into writing vide memorandum of

5. Learned counsel appearing for respondent has filed a copy of the said memorandum of understanding vide USR.No.120178, dated

27.10.2025.

6. Considering the said fact, vide order, dated 30.10.2025, we have directed the parties to appear before the Secretary, Legal Services Authority, High Court, for identification. On completion of identification, the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, have filed a report, dated 10.11.2025, wherein it is stated “when asked, both the parties stated that they have wilfully and without any coercion entered into compromise”.

7. Vide the aforesaid memorandum of understanding, both the parties agreed to obtain a decree of divorce and the respondent husband agreed to pay Rs.20,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Lakhs Only) to the appellant and the particulars are mentioned in the aforesaid memorandum of understanding. Sri V.Nageswara Rao, learned counsel for the appellant on instructions confirms the receipt of the said payment by the appellant.

8. In the light of the same, this family court appeal is disposed of There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this appeal shall stand closed. K. LAKSHMAN, J NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA, J November 13, 2025 AQS

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top