2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 28906
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
Patlolla Naveen Kumar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 15893/2025
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.15893 OF 2025
O R D E R:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief/s:-
“... to issue order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos.5 & 6 in interfering into the peaceful possession of the Petitioner from his land to an extent of Ac.1-04 gts. in Sy.No.170/A1/6, and to an extent of Ac.8-37 gts. in Sy.No.169/AA, which is situated at Kankal Village of Poduru Mandal, Vikarabad District and trying to dispossess the petitioner from his cultivating land and threatening to hand over the land of the petitioner to the Respondent Nos.7 to 10 without issuing any notice and without following the due process of law, is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violation of Articles 14, 15, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and also violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the Respondent Nos. 5 & 6 not to interfere into the peaceful possession of the Petitioner from his land to an extent of Ac.1-04 gts. in Sy.No.170/A1/6, and to an extent of Ac.8-37 gts. in Sy.No.169/AA, which is situated at Kankal Village of Poduru Mandal, Vikarabad District and not to dispossess the Petitioner from his cultivating land and not to threaten to hand over the land to the Respondent Nos.7 to 10, pending and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case…”
2. Heard Mr.Rapolu Bhaskar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader representing learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 6 and Mr.Maturi Murthy Maan, learned counsel representing respondent Nos.7 to 9.
Perused the record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent authorities are trying to dispossess the petitioner from the subject land without following the procedure contemplated under law. Therefore, he seeks to pass appropriate orders.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue contends that in the event of the respondent authorities intend to dispossess the petitioner from the subject property, they shall follow due process of law.
5. Having regard to the submissions of both the learned counsel and on perusal of the material available on record, this Court, without making any observations on the possession of the petitioner, is inclined to direct the respondent authorities to strictly follow the procedure contemplated under law, by issuing notices to the interested parties and affording them sufficient opportunity of hearing, in the event they intend to dispossess the petitioner from the subject property.
6. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________
E.V.VENUGOPAL, J Date: 16.10.2025
ESP
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
349 WRIT PETITION No.15893 OF 2025 Date: 16.10.2025 ESP