IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
Smt. G. Prasanna alias Swapna – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 28880/2025
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No.28880 of 2025
ORAL ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
Mr. L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for
Revenue appearing for the respondents.
2. According to the petitioner, her father i.e., G. Chennaiah was the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring Ac.5-19 gts in Sy.No.177/A, situated at Naskal Village, Pargi Mandal, Rangareddy District. After his death, respondent No.5 obtained succession and mutation proceedings in respect of subject property contending that he is adoptive son which is factually incorrect. Respondent No.6 is the mother of petitioner. Sri Billapati Narsimulu and two others have filed a suit vide O.S.No.157 of 2024 against petitioner and others seeking partition and separate possession of the suit schedule property. The said suit is pending and there are no interim orders. According to the petitioner, respondent No.5 has obtained succession and mutation proceedings dated 10.12.2024 in respect of subject property without putting the petitioner on notice and without affording her an opportunity.
Challenging the said proceedings, petitioner filed the present writ petition.
3. On the request made by respondent No.3, respondent No.4 has submitted a report dated 21.05.2025 to the respondent No.3 stating that petitioner never made an application before Registration. Therefore, she has to approach Civil Court for claiming her right.
4. As discussed supra, petitioner is claiming right over the subject property. According to her, respondent No.5 is not adoptive son of her father i.e., late G. Chennaiah. He has obtained the said succession and mutation proceedings by misrepresentation. Petitioner has share over the subject property and it is rightly observed by respondent No.4 vide proceedings dated 21.05.2025, if, the petitioner has share over the subject property, she has to approach Civil Court. On obtaining order from the Civil Court, she has to approach revenue authorities for implementation of the same.
5. In the light of the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach Civil Court for settlement of her claim/share, on obtaining orders, approach revenue authorities for implementation of the same. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________
K. LAKSHMAN, J
23.09.2025 ssy
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.