SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 29611

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
Puljari Suresh Goud – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
CRLP 12176/2025



HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA

CRIMINAL PETITION No.12176 of 2025

ORDER

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 Bharatiya

Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) by the petitioners/accused Nos.2 to 5 seeking to quash the proceedings against them in Crime No.235 of 2025 on the file of Wanaparthy Town Police Station, Wanaparthy District, registered for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 262 and 263 of The

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNS’).

2. Heard Sri Veerababu Gandu, learned counsel for the petitioners and Smt. Shalini Saxena, learned Assistant Public

Prosecutor appearing for the respondent No.1-State.

3. Though this petition is filed for quashing the proceedings in the crime, during the course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioners has sought for directions to the Police to proceed with investigation by issuing notice under Section 35(3) of BNSS

(Previously Section 41-A of Cr.P.C.).

4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor has not disputed the

same.

5. Considering the submissions of both the counsel and on perusal of the material available on record, it is seen that the allegations are under Sections 262 and 263 of the BNS and the punishment prescribed for the said offences alleged against the petitioners is less than seven (07) years. Hence, without going into the merits of the case, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the petitioners to appear before the Investigating Officer on or before 01.10.2025 between 11:00 a.m. and 05:00 p.m. and in turn, the Investigating Officer is directed to follow the procedure laid down under Section 35 (3) of the BNSS (previously section 41-A of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973) and also the guidelines formulated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar, (2014) 8 SCC 273 scrupulously. However, the petitioners shall submit their defense and co-operate with the Investigating Officer as and when required by furnishing information and produce all relevant documents/material required for the purpose of the investigation and the Investigating Officer shall consider the same and shall complete the investigation strictly in accordance with law.

6. With the above said observations, this Criminal Petition is disposed of.

7. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

_____________________________

JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Date: 17.09.2025 ds

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top