IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA
Konduri Padma – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
CRLP 11538/2025
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.11538 of 2025
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed before this Court for
grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners who are arrayed as accused Nos.3, 5 and 6 in Crime No.437 of 2025 of
Karimnagar-I Town Police Station, Karimnagar District.
2. Heard Sri Mirza Azmath Ali Baig, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Sri Arun Kumar Doddla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf
of the respondent - State.
3. Without going into the merits of the case, it is seen from the record that the petitioners have directly approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,
2023.
4. At this stage, it is pertinent to note the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, in the case of Mohammed
Rasal. C and Another v. State of Kerala and Another, Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.6588/2025 dated 08.09.2025 has clearly held that though the Sessions Court and the High Court exercise concurrent jurisdiction to entertain applications for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS (formerly Section 438 Cr.P.C.), judicial discipline and the hierarchy of Courts require that such applications must ordinarily be filed before the Sessions Court in the first instance. The Hon’ble Supreme Court further observed that entertaining such applications directly in the High Court, without first invoking the jurisdiction of the Sessions Court, undermines procedural discipline and unnecessarily burdens the High Court with matters that can be effectively dealt with at the District level. The Sessions Court, being the court of first contact, is better placed to consider such applications as it has immediate access to case records and the assistance of the concerned Public Prosecutor. It is only in exceptional or extraordinary circumstances, with reasons specifically recorded, that the High Court may entertain a direct application.
5. In view of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, this Court finds it appropriate to direct the petitioners to first approach the Sessions Court for seeking the relief of anticipatory bail.
6. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to approach the Sessions Court for grant of pre-arrest bail.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_______________
K. SUJANA, J Date:11.09.2025 TU
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.