SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 29763

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA
Konduri Padma – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
CRLP 11538/2025



THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA

CRIMINAL PETITION No.11538 of 2025

ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed before this Court for

grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners who are arrayed as accused Nos.3, 5 and 6 in Crime No.437 of 2025 of

Karimnagar-I Town Police Station, Karimnagar District.

2. Heard Sri Mirza Azmath Ali Baig, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Sri Arun Kumar Doddla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf

of the respondent - State.

3. Without going into the merits of the case, it is seen from the record that the petitioners have directly approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,

2023.

4. At this stage, it is pertinent to note the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, in the case of Mohammed

Rasal. C and Another v. State of Kerala and Another, Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.6588/2025 dated 08.09.2025 has clearly held that though the Sessions Court and the High Court exercise concurrent jurisdiction to entertain applications for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS (formerly Section 438 Cr.P.C.), judicial discipline and the hierarchy of Courts require that such applications must ordinarily be filed before the Sessions Court in the first instance. The Hon’ble Supreme Court further observed that entertaining such applications directly in the High Court, without first invoking the jurisdiction of the Sessions Court, undermines procedural discipline and unnecessarily burdens the High Court with matters that can be effectively dealt with at the District level. The Sessions Court, being the court of first contact, is better placed to consider such applications as it has immediate access to case records and the assistance of the concerned Public Prosecutor. It is only in exceptional or extraordinary circumstances, with reasons specifically recorded, that the High Court may entertain a direct application.

5. In view of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, this Court finds it appropriate to direct the petitioners to first approach the Sessions Court for seeking the relief of anticipatory bail.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to approach the Sessions Court for grant of pre-arrest bail.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

_______________

K. SUJANA, J Date:11.09.2025 TU

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top