SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 30134

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
MANAGERANDAUTH SIGN. M/S.SRK FOODS PRIVATE LTD. RR DIST – Appellant
Versus
PRL SECY DEPT OF HOME HYDERABAD AND 7 OTHERS – Respondent
WP 43315/2016



THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI

WRIT PETITION No.43315 OF 2016

ORDER

This writ petition is filed seeking for the following

relief:

“to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in

the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the raid and search conducted by the 3rd respondent on 08-12-2016 on the petitioners company and the seizure of its products and other items, as illegal, highhanded, without any power or authority and against the procedure contemplated under law and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 3 to forthwith to handover the seized goods and packaging material by unlocking the petitioners premises containing

goods and packaging material of the petitioner...”

2. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner.

3. I have heard Mr.R.Laxmikanth Reddy, learned

respondent Nos.1 to 4.

submits that in Crime No.245 of 2016, the Investigating Agency conducted search on 07.12.2016 at M/s SRK Food Products Private Limited, Company, Bongloor Village and

on 08.12.2016 at M/s SRK Food Products Private Limited, Company at MP Patelguda Village, and seized articles and they were produced before the IV Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Ibrahimpatnam. Subsequently, the case was transferred to XV Metropolitan Magistrate, Ibrahimpatnam, and the matter is still pending. Thus, the contest that there was illegal seizure by the respondent No.3 was improper is unjustified. Hence, prayed for dismissal of the petition.

5. I have perused the materials on record.

6. Having regard to the assertion and the statement of respondents in written submissions that, the seized articles/products from the possession of the petitioner’s company has been properly produced before the Court concerned. He contest that the respondents have conducted search and seizure without lawful authority, is found unacceptable. Thus, the contest in this regard is dismissed. However the rights of the petitioner are reserved to avail appropriate remedy before the Court concerned in regard to seized property. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

________________ N.TUKARAMJI, J Date:29.08.2025 mmr/js

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top