IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA, J.
Shaik Khadar Basha – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India, Rep. BY THE Chief Executive Officer-Cum-Chairman & Others – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 35836 Of 2025
Decided On : 08-01-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of petitioner’s licensing history. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments presented by the respondent. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's reasoning on renewal rights. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. final decision on the writ petition. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
ORDER :
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA, J.
1. Petitioner states that he has been earning his livelihood solely through railway catering licences. He previously held platform stalls at various railway stations and was awarded a Special Minor Unit Tea Stall No. SMU/018 on Platforms 4 and 5 at Kacheguda Railway Station with effect from 10.09.2016. He was also awarded a General Minor Unit licence at Guntakal Railway Station with effect from 19.07.2018. It is stated, notifications issued under Catering Policy, 2010 were challenged by the SCR Caterers, Dry Fruits, Fruit Juice Stalls Welfare Association and others in Writ Petition Nos. 14577, 14888 and 15072 of 2013. By order dated 16.08.2013, this Court held that existing licensees were entitled to consideration for renewal subject to policy conditions, which order was confirmed by the Division Bench on 12.09.2013 in Writ Appeal Nos. 1573, 1574 and 1575 of 2013.
1.1. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal Nos. 618–620 of 2016 arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 9921–9923 of 2014, by judgment dated 29.01.2016, held that denial of renewal was arbitrary and it affected the right to livelihood of licensees solely dependent on such units. The Court clarified that renewal would be available only to those holding a single unit and declaring the same on affidavit. It is stated further, subsequently, the Ministry of Railways issued Catering Policy, 2017 vide Commercial Circular No. 20 of 2017 dated 27.02.2017, revising the tenure of units to five years without renewal. In compliance with the Supreme Court judgment, Commercial Circular No. 22 of 2017 dated 15.03.2017 was issued, permitting renewal of a single retained minor unit after surrender of other units, subject to conditions specified therein.
1.2. At the time of issuance of Commercial Circular No. 22 of 2017, petitioner held the Tea Stall licence at Kacheguda Railway Station and a GMU licence at Guntakal Railway Station. The Tea Stall licence was awarded vide Letter of Award dated 28.07.2016 under Special Minor Units – Minorities quota, commenced on 10.09.2016 and was initially valid till 09.09.2021. Due to Covid-19, a dies-non period of 323 days was granted and the licence was extended up to 29.07.2022. To comply with Commercial Circular No. 22 of 2017, petitioner surrendered the GMU licence at Guntakal Railway Station, which was valid from 19.10.2018 to 18.10.2023 and the said surrender was accepted by the Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, Guntakal Division, and the GMU licence was surrendered with effect from 18.02.2022. After submission of required documents pursuant to letter dated 10.03.2022, the Tea Stall licence at Kacheguda was renewed for three years from 30.07.2022 to 29.07.2025, and an agreement dated 18.11.2022 was executed specifically referring to Railway Board letter dated 15.03.2017, Commercial Circular No. 22 of 2017.
1.3. Before expiry of the renewed period, petitioner applied for further renewal for three years vide letter dated 13.12.2024 and again on 08.05.2025 due to no response. He was permitted to continue operating the Tea Stall beyond 29.07.2025, creating a legitimate expectation of renewal in terms of policy. However, it is stated, he received a Show Cause Notice dated 29.09.2025, served on 03.10.2025, invoking Para 17 of Catering Policy, 2010, alleging unsatisfactory performance due to penalties imposed on more than five occasions. Petitioner replied on 09.10.2025 stating that he retained only one stall under Commercial Circular No. 22 of 2017, depended solely on it for livelihood; complaints regarding overcharging of packaged drinking water were vague and did not identify vendors, and that penalties were paid to avoid disputes.
1.4. By letter dated 21.11.2025, the 3rd respondent rejected th
Licenses under Catering Policy are subject to renewal only upon satisfactory performance; violations of service standards invalidate renewal expectations.
The court established that renewal of a contractual licence is not an automatic right and requires strict adherence to stipulated conditions, including timely submission of mandatory documents.
The court ruled that the renewal of food stall licenses must adhere to the Catering Policy 2010, emphasizing the rights of existing licensees despite the expiration of their licenses.
Tender-based catering licenses under 2017 policy non-renewable per agreement terms; older code inapplicable excluding tenders; no perpetual right after prior binding judgments dismissing renewal clai....
License renewal subject to satisfactory performance; penalties on licensee justified rejection of renewal application.
The petitioner cannot claim renewal of a catering license under the new policy due to failure to meet stipulated conditions outlined in previous judicial decisions.
Renewal of catering unit licenses is not automatic and is subject to fulfilling specified conditions as per the Catering Policy, 2010.
Point of Law : If there was variation in catering charges, revision of license fee was required to be on sales assessment basis and not pro-rata basis.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.