IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
Mohd. Mustaq alias Kanda Mustaq – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
CRLP 17926/2025
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE SMT.JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.17926 of 2025
Date:31.12.2025
Between:
Mohd. Mustaq
…Petitioner/Accused
And
State of Telangana,
Rep. by the Public Prosecutor,
High Court for the State of Telangana,
Hyderabad and another.
... Respondents
ORDER:
This criminal petition is filed seeking to quash the
proceedings against the petitioner-accused in Crime No.270 of
2025 on the file of the Station House Officer, Madannapet Police
Station, Hyderabad, registered for the offence under Section
351(2) of BNS.
2. Heard Mr. M.A. Mujeeb, learned counsel for the
petitioner and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional
Public Prosecutor for the respondent No.1-State.
##PAGE2##2 ETD,J
Crl.P. No.17926 of 2025
3. Though this petition is filed for quashing the
proceedings in the crime, during the course of arguments, learned
counsel for petitioner has sought for a direction to the Police to
follow the procedure laid down under Section 35(3) of Bharatiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS).
4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that
the police have already served notice under Section 35(3) of
BNSS to the petitioner and hence, prayed to pass appropriate
orders in the petition.
5. Perused the record.
6. The offence alleged against the petitioner is under
Section under Section 351(2) of BNS. Considering the
submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and as the
petitioner was already served with notice under Section 35(3) of
BNSS, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the police
concerned to consider the explanation submitted by the petitioner
and to follow the procedure laid down under Section 35 (3) of
BNSS and the guidelines formulated by the Hon’ble Apex Court in
##PAGE3##3 ETD,J
Crl.P. No.17926 of 2025
Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar, (2014) 8 SCC 273 scrupulously. The petitioner is
also directed to co-operate with the Investigating Officer and to
furnish the requisite information and documents as and when
required by him.
7. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of with
the above directions. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any,
shall stand closed.
____________________________
JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
December 31, 2025
KTL
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.