SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 31969

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
P.Madhav – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 40095/2025



##PAGE1##

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT

HYDERABAD

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

WRIT PETITION No.40095 of 2025

DATE OF ORDER: 30.12.2025

BETWEEN:

P.Madhav

… Petitioner

AND

The State of Telangana,

Rep. by its Prl.Secretary and 3 others.

… Respondents

: ORDER :

This writ petition is filed to declare the action of respondent

Nos.2 to 4 in not correcting the entries in the Digital Passbook in

respect of petitioner’s land in Sy.No.34/2, admeasuring Ac.1.03

guntas, situated at Keshavaram Village, Muduchintal Mandal

(erstwhile Shamirpet Mandal), Medchal-Ranga Reddy District,

despite the petitioner having filed an application bearing

No.2500050270, dated 30.06.2025, as illegal and arbitrary and for

consequential relief.

2. Heard Sri N.Krishna Sumanth, learned counsel for the

petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue.

##PAGE2##

2

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the

petitioner is the owner of land admeasuring Ac.2.07 guntas in

Sy.No.33/2, Ac.1.03 guntas in Sy.No.34/2 and Ac.1.30 guntas in

Sy.No.35/2, totaling to Ac.5.00 guntas, situated at Keshavaram

Village and Gram Panchayat, Shamirpet Mandal, presently

Muduchintalapalapally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District presently

Medchal-Malkajgiri District, having purchased the same through

registered sale deed bearing document No.822 of 1996, dated

10.07.1996 from Smt.Thota Vinatha Reddy, who purchased the

same under registered sale deed bearing document No.619 of

1991, dated 25.01.1991 from Mogulla Krishna Reddy; that the

petitioner’s name was entered in revenue records and pattedar

pass book No.439186, Patta No.617 and title deeds were issued in

his favour. Further, the MRO, Shamirpet has issued mutation

proceedings vide proceedings No.1105 of 2004, dated 21.08.2004.

The Petitioner’s name was also reflected in the revenue records

including Pahanis till the year 2016-2017.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that

the State has come up with Telangana Bhu Bharati (Record of

Rights in Land) Act, 2024 and has undertaken revision and

digitalization of revenue entries through online portal by updating

the names; and that in the said process the respondents have

##PAGE3##

3

issued digital pattedar pass books to the petitioner in respect of

Ac.1.30 gutnas in Sy.No.35/2 and Ac.2.07 guntas in Sy.No.33/2.

However, the land to an extent of Ac.1.03 guntas in Sy.No.34/2

was not reflected in the digital pattadar pass book issued to the

petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner submitted representation

dated 12.06.2025 to 4th respondent who orally informed the

petitioner to apply for inclusion of missing survey numbers

through Bhubharati portal. Accordingly, the petitioner submitted

online application through Bhu Bharati portal on 30.06.2025 vide

application No.2500050270. Though, five months have elapsed,

the said application has not been processed by the respondents

till date. Aggrieved by the same, present writ petition is filed.

5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue would

submit that since the petitioner has already submitted online

application for correction of entries with regard to the missing

extent of land, the respondents will consider the same and pass

appropriate orders, provided reasonable time is granted to them.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel

for the petitioner as well as learned Assistant Government Pleader

for Revenue, the writ petition is disposed of directing the

respondents to consider the application submitted by the

##PAGE4##

4

petitioner through online portal dated 30.06.2025 vide application

No.2500050270 and pass appropriate orders strictly in

accordance with law, by duly giving notices and affording

opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as affected parties.

The respondents shall complete the entire exercise within a period

of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending

in the writ petition, shall stan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top