IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR
Sri Anil Kapatkar S/o Somnath Rao Kapatkar – Appellant
Versus
The Government of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
WP 27461/2013
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
* * * *
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.27461 of 2013
DATE: 23.12.2025
Between
Sri Anil Kapatkar and 5 others
…Petitioners
AND
The Government of Andhra Pradesh
Represented by its Principal Secretary and 2 others
…Respondents
ORDER
This Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus to
declare the action of the respondent No.3 in keeping the
documents No.P-43/2012 and P-44/2012 dated 25.01.2012 as
pending, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the
respondent No.3 to release the said documents after due
registration to the petitioners.
2.
The case of the petitioners is that they are the absolute
owners and possessors of vast extents of land in Sy.Nos.691, 692,
693, 699, 701, 703 to 707 of Chilkoor Village, Moinabad Mandal,
Ranga Reddy District; and that petitioner Nos.1 to 4 entered into
##PAGE2##2
agreement of sale-cum-GPA vide document No.9484 of 2006 and
petitioner No.5 entered into agreement of sale-cum-GPA vide
Document No.8484 of 2006 with M/s. West Side Estates Private
Limited.
3.
It is further submitted that the agreement of sale-cum-GPA
holders divided the land into several plots and sold the same from
2006 onwards; that the respondents were registering the said
documents without any objection till January, 2012; and that on
25.01.2012, the subject documents pertaining to Plot Nos.21-part
and 28 were presented for registration before the respondent
No.3 and they were given pending Nos.P-43 and P-44, without
assigning any reason. It is also submitted that in spite of several
representations, the respondents neither replied nor released the
documents kept pending since January, 2012 onwards. Hence,
this Writ Petition.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
respondents kept the documents pending presented for
registration since the year 2012 without assigning any reason,
despite several representations. In support of his contention, he
relied upon Section 71 of the Registration Act, 1908 (for short,
‘the Act’).
##PAGE3##3
5.
Section 71 of the Act specifies that:
“71. Reasons for refusal to register to be recorded – (1) Every
Sub-Registrar refusing to register a document, except on the
ground that the property to which it relates is not situate within
his sub-district, shall make an order of refusal and record his
reasons for such order in his Book No.2 and endorse the words
“registration refused” on the document: and, on application made
by any person executing or claiming under the document, shall,
without payment and unnecessary delay, give him a copy of the
reasons so recorded.”
6.
Admittedly, the petitioners approached the respondents by
way representations dated 20.03.2012, 19.04.2012, 11.05.2012,
01.12.2012, 20.03.2013 and 25.07.2013, but the respondents did
not act upon them and still kept the subject documents pending.
7.
From a plain reading of Section 71 of the Act, it is evident
that without unnecessary delay, the Sub-Registrar is under
obligation to pass a reasoned order recording the grounds for
refusal in accordance with law. The provision further mandates
that a copy of such reasoned order shall be furnished to the
person who made the application.
8.
In view of the aforesaid provision and the legal obligation
cast upon the respondents, this Court deems it appropriate to
grant liberty to the petitioners to approach the authorities
concerned by way of a fresh representation within a week from
##PAGE4##4
the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of such
representation, the respondents are directed to duly consider the
same and pass a reasoned order in accordance with law and
communicate the same to he petitioners, within a period of four
weeks thereafter.
9.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed. No order as to
costs.
10.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________
GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, J
Date: 23.12.2025
GJ
##PAGE5##5
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.27461 of 2013
DATE:23.12.2025
GJ
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.