SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 32699

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
E.V. Venugopal, J
K. RAMULU – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
W.P.No.39086 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Chatla Madhu
For the Respondents: L. Ravinder, P. Sreenivasa Rao

Where a factual dispute exists regarding the encroachment of a protected buffer zone despite a valid building permit, the court may direct a joint survey by relevant authorities to determine the facts before deciding on the legality of the construction.

Headnote:The petitioner challenged the obstruction of construction of a residential building despite possessing valid building permission, alleging that the authorities acted arbitrarily based on complaints from local residents. The official respondents contended that the construction encroached upon the Kapra Lake Nala Buffer Area, violating conditions stipulated in G.O.Ms.No.168 dated 07-04-2012. The court found that there is a factual dispute regarding the actual extent of the encroachment. The primary issue is whether the construction of the residential building encroaches upon the protected buffer zone of the lake/nala. The court reasoned that since the petitioner denies encroachment while the official respondents assert it, the matter can only be resolved through a technical joint survey conducted by the municipal authorities and irrigation officials to determine the exact boundaries. The Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the respondent Nos. 5 and 6 to conduct the necessary enquiry and joint survey along with irrigation officials as expeditiously possible, preferably, within a period of sixty days and conclude the said survey by issuing notices to the petitioner and other necessary parties within a period of 15 working days and based upon such survey, take appropriate action in accordance with law and till such time, the parties are directed to maintain status quo as on today.

ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed to declare the action of the 4th respondent in interfering with petitioner’s peaceful possession by obstructing the construction of petitioner’s individual residential building in plot No.31 (Southern Part), street/road Goudapuri, Locality ‘Ashok Colony’. in Sy. Nos.522 (part), 523 and 524, situated at Kapra village, Kapra Mandal, Kapra Circle-1, LB Nagar Zone, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, despite the valid building permission and work commencement letter granted by the respondent Nos.5 and 6, as illegal and arbitrary.

Heard Sri Chatla Madhu, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri L. Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 4 and Sri P. Sreenivasa Rao, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Nos.5 and 6. Perused the material available on record.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is legally in possession of the subject property and for which, the 5th respondent-GHMC has sanctioned building permission in favour of the petitioner vide TG-bPASS Building Permit Order bearing Application No./Permit No.431020GHMC151172024, Permit No.4310207988GHMC2024 dated 04-09-2024 and thereafter, he started construction of residential building. While it is so, the respondent No.4 is trying to dispossess the petitioner from the subject land based upon the complaint filed by the local people. He would further submit that the local people due to the personal grudge against the petitioner filed a complaint stating that the subject land is under revenue enquiry and is alleged to be the ‘Government land’. Based upon which, the 4th respondent acted upon and inspected the building and unilaterally decided that the petitioner had encroached the existing Kapra Lake Nala Buffer Area situated at Ashoka Colony, on the strength of the building permit granted by the 5th respondent. He would further submit that no notice was issued to the petitioner before conducting any inspection and without issuing any notice conducting inspection in the property of the petitioner is per se illegal and seeks to pass appropriate orders.

Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue would submit that since it has been found that the petitioner has illegally encroached the existing kapra buffer area, it is impermissible and contrary to the subject building permit granted by the 5th respondent and is violation of the conditions as contemplated in the said building permit. He would further submit that building permission sanctioned was subject to certain conditions as per Clause 5.f (i) to (vii) (xi), (xiv) of G.O.Ms.No.168 dated 07-04-2012. Therefore, having received the complaint from the local people, necessary inspection was conducted pertaining to the land covered in the buffer area but not the land of the petitioner by the official respondents and since it has been noticed that the petitioner has been encroached upon the property of the buffer zone, necessary caution has been given to the petitioner not to proceed until the joint survey will be conducted along with officials. Despite the said oral caution given to the petitioner, the petitioner is continuing the said construction and therefore, seeks to dismiss the Writ Petition.

Learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Nos.5 and 6 has contended in the similar lines as contended by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the Revenue.

Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides, and upon a careful consideration and examination of the material available on record, this Court is of the view that the petitioner contends that he has not encroached upon the Buffer Area of Kapra Lake / Nala Buffer Zone, whereas the official respondents assert that the petitioner has, in fact, encroached into the said buffer zone.This aspect is to be known only after conducting joint survey by the respondent No.5 along with 6th responde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top