SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 32823

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
Danthuri Saidulu – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 39153/2025



##PAGE1##

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

WRIT PETITION No.39153 OF 2025

Dated 19th December, 2025

Between:

Danthuri Saidulu.

…Petitioner

AND

The State of Telangana,

Rep. by its Principal Secretary,

School Education Department,

Secretariat, Hyderabad and 3 others.

…Respondents

O R D E R :

With the consent of the parties, this Writ Petition is taken

up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:

“…to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature

of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 & 3 not

considering the representations 23.08.2025 & 27.09.2025 submitted by the

petitioner for promotion to the post of Gazetted Head Master (Local Body),

Grade-II in Multi Zone-II in any vacant post on par with his juniors by

rectifying the seniority list and consequently direct the respondents to give

the promotion to the petitioner for the post of Gazetted Head Master (Local

Body), Grade-II in Multi Zone-II as per his seniority on par with his juniors by

rectifying the seniority list with all consequential benefits, in the interest of

justice and pass…”

##PAGE2##

2

3. Heard Sri K.Uday Kumar, learned counsel for the

petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Services-I for the

respondents.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

petitioner is working as School Assistant (Maths) and though he

is eligible for promotion to the post of Gazetted Head Master

(Local Body), Grade-II, respondent No.3 had promoted the

petitioner’s juniors by ignoring his case. As such, the petitioner

submitted representations to respondent Nos.2 and 3 on

27.09.2025 and 23.08.2025, respectively, ventilating his

grievance. However, no action has been taken so far. Therefore,

learned counsel prays this Court to direct respondent Nos.2 and

3 to consider the representations dated 27.09.2025 and

23.08.2025 submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate

orders, within a time-frame to be stipulated by this Court.

5. Learned Government Pleader appearing for the

respondents fairly submits that respondent Nos.2 and 3 will

consider the petitioner’s representations dated 27.09.2025 and

##PAGE3##

3

23.08.2025 and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with

law.

6. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel

for the respective parties and without going into the merits of

the case, this Writ Petition is disposed of, directing respondent

Nos.2 and 3 to pass appropriate orders on the representations

dated 27.09.2025 and 23.08.2025, respectively, submitted by

the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiously

as possible, preferably within a period of six (6) weeks from the

date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate a copy of

the same to the petitioner.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

There shall be no order as to costs.

______________________

PULLA KARTHIK, J

Date : 19.12.2025

TMK

##PAGE4##

4

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

WRIT PETITION No.39153 OF 2025

Date : 19.12.2025

TMK

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top