2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 34382
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
Mohammad Abdul Saleem – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 23490/2025
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.23490 of 2025 DATE OF ORDER:09.12.2025 Between:
Mohammad Abdul Saleem, S/o Late Mohammad Abdul Khader, Aged 37 Years, Occ:Business at Dubai, R/o H.No.12-4-86/14, Khadarpura, Siddipet Town & District, Telangana.
…Petitioner AND The state of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and five others …Respondents
ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 5.
With their consent, this writ petition is being taken up for disposal.
2. This writ petition has been filed questioning the action of the Originators respondent Nos.3 and 4 in preventing the petitioner from travelling outside country particularly Dubai citing Look Out Circular issued due to pendency of Dowry Harassment Case registered for the offence under Section 498-A of IPC and Section 4 of D.P.Act in C.C.No.945 of 2023 (F.I.R.No.20/2023) pending on the file of the Hon’ble III Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate (Special Mobile at Nizamabad) on the Complaint lodged by the 6th respondent as being arbitrary, without authority, power, illegal and in violation of Office Memorandum dated 22.02.2021 issued by the 2nd respondent with consolidated guidelines for issuance of Look Out Circular in respect of Indian Citizens and Foreigners, Article 14, 21 of the Constitution of India and Principles of Natural Justice and seeking a consequential direction to set-aside the Look Out Circular issued against the petitioner by the Originators Respondent Nos.3 and 4 forthwith.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for Home has placed the written instruction submitted by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Women Police Station, Nizamabad Commissionerate wherein it is submitted that respondent No.6 had lodged a complaint dated 25.03.2023 with the respondent No.4 against the petitioner and his mother, pursuant to the said complaint a case was registered as F.I.R.No.20 of 2023 dated 25.03.2023 under Section 498-A of IPC and Section 4 of D.P.Act against the accused Nos.1 and 2, whereas petitioner is arrayed as A-1. It is submitted that petitioner did not co- operate with the investigation agency and without any intimation fled away from India as such during the course of investigation LOC was issued against the petitioner vide proceedings No.64/WPS/NZB/2023 dated 08.04.2023 by the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Nizamabad Commissionerate and after thorough investigation Charge Sheet has been filed vide C.C.No.945 of 2023 and the case is pending trial before the Hon’ble III Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate (Special Mobile) at Nizamabad. It is further submitted that the petitioner had obtained interim order dated 10.07.2023 in W.P.No.17817 of 2023 and in pursuance of the same LOC was set-aside for three months vide proceedings No.102/WPS/2023 dated 13.07.2023. The respondent No.4 after thorough investigation has filed charge sheet in the above case, whereas the petitioner has neither co-operated with the investigation nor appeared before the Hon’ble Magistrate for trial and that petitioner is now planning to come to India and if the LOC issued against the petitioner is suspended again the petitioner may fled away without intimation as such the LOC is required for conducting proper trial of the above case. It is further submitted that petitioner instead of appearing in C.C.No.945 of 2023 pending trial before the Hon’ble III Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate (Special Mobile) at Nizamabad has filed the present writ petition.
4. Per contra, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is appearing in C.C.No.945 of 2023 pending trial before the Hon’ble III Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate (Special Mobile)
at Nizamabad.
5. In that view of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with consent directi