Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
APARESH KUMAR SINGH, G.M.MOHIUDDIN
Routhu Sravanthi – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana, Revenue Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ownership claims and challenges to acquisition (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. allegations of colorable exercise of power and procedural safeguards (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. defenses regarding standing and legality of acquisition processes (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. legal capacity and circumstances of claim (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. impact of property transactions and limitations under the rfctlarr act (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. constitutionality and validity of legislative amendments (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 7. balance between public interest and individual rights in land acquisition (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 8. final judgment and implications on acquisition legitimacy (Para 34 , 35 , 36) |
ORDER :
Heard Sri Sista Venkata Kameswara Saketh, learned counsel for the petitioners; Sri E.Ramesh Chandra Goud, learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition appearing for respondent No.3; and Sri Srikant Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (for short ‘TSIIC’) appearing for respondent No.4 and perused the record.
2. In the present writ petition, the petitioners assert ownership over various extents of land situated in Sy.N
Subsequent purchasers of land lacking notice after the preliminary acquisition notification cannot challenge acquisition proceedings due to lack of locus standi and the statutory prohibition on trans....
The court emphasized the importance of procedural compliance and the requirement for acquisitions to serve a 'public purpose' as defined under the Act of 2013.
Land acquisition proceedings are invalid if statutory requirements are not met, particularly regarding notifications and timelines, as established by the Land Acquisition Act and the 2013 Act.
The court established that adherence to procedural fairness and the right to a hearing are fundamental in land acquisition processes under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
If there is failure to publish notification in two daily newspapers, notification and consequential proceedings for acquiring land would stand vitiated for non-compliance of essential conditions of S....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
