IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
Telangana Private Medical and Dental Colleges Management Association – Appellant
Versus
Principal Secretary, Department of Health & Medical and Family Welfare, State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA, J.
The present Writ Petition filed by the Association of Telangana Medical and Dental Colleges Management as a representative of the Managements of Private Unaided Medical and Dental Colleges situated in State of Telangana seeking directions to respondents to fix uniform fee structure for all the students admitted in first year post graduate medical and dental degree and diploma courses across the categories except NRI students. Further, seeking directions to fix different fee structures for different medical & dental colleges after taking all the relevant factors into consideration as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in TMA Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka : (2002) 8 SCC 481 , Islamic Academy of Education v. State of Karnataka : (2003) 6 SCC 697 , P.A. Inamdar v. State of Maharashtra , (2005) 6 SCC 537 and as further analyzed by the Division Bench of this Court in Consortium of Engineering Colleges Management Association v Govt. of Andhra Pradesh , 2012(3) LT 686.
2. Petitioner contends that it is an Association of Management of all Private Unaided Medical and Dental Colleges in State of Telangana and represents its collective wisdom and decisions




TMA Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka
Islamic Academy of Education v. State of Karnataka
P.A. Inamdar v. State of Maharashtra
Private educational institutions can set their own fee structures, provided they do not engage in profiteering or capitation fees, adhering to principles established in precedential Supreme Court cas....
Point of law: The right to establish an educational institution can be regulated; but such regulatory measures must, in general, be to ensure the maintenance of proper academic standards, atmosphere ....
Fee structure determined by the ‘Fee Fixation Committee’ constituted by the respondent University in supersession of fee structure already proposed by the ‘Fee Regulatory Committee’ constituted by th....
The respondents could not impose the conditions under the impugned clauses 10, 13, 21, and 22 while approving the fee structure in the petitioners' institute, as the conditions were not lawful and we....
The determination of fees for private medical colleges must be conducted by the Fee Regulatory Committee as per the Act of 2006, and the State Government cannot unilaterally extend previous fee struc....
The impugned Government order was illegal and arbitrary as it was issued in exercise of power under Section 7 of the A.P. Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Prohibition of Capitati....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.