IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH,THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.M. MOHIUDDIN
M/s. PEDDI LINGAMURTHY AND SONS – Appellant
Versus
The Joint Commissioner – Respondent
WP 36572/2025
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI APARESH KUMAR SINGH AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.M.MOHIUDDIN WRIT PETITION No.36572 of 2025 Dated: 02.12.2025 Between:
M/s. Peddi Lingamurthy & Sons …Petitioner and The Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Appellate Authority, Secunderabad-Hyderabad CBIC, Telangana, And three others.
…Respondents
ORDER:
Learned counsel Sri G.Durga Charan appears for the petitioner.
Sri Dominic Fernandes, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, appears for respondent No.1.
Sri Sai Akarsh, learned Assistant Government Pleader representing Sri Swaroop Oorilla, learned Special Government Pleader for State Tax, appears for respondents No.2 and 3.
Sri B. Mukherjee, learned counsel representing Sri N.Bhujanga Rao, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India, appears for respondent No.4.
2. The petitioner has assailed the order-in-appeal dated 09.09.2025 (Annexure P.1) by which the appeal filed by the petitioner was rejected on the ground of delay as it was submitted beyond the time limit prescribed for preferring an appeal under Section 107(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner has also assailed the order-in-original dated 29.12.2023 for the tax period
2017 - 2018.
3. Learned Senior Standing Counsel for Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs appearing for respondent No.1 submits that the appeal filed by the petitioner was dismissed on the grounds of delay beyond 90 + 30 days condonable period. The petitioner has a remedy of appeal before the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal as per circular dated 24.09.2025 between 01.02.2026 and
30.06.2026.
4. Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, as the petitioner has an effective remedy of appeal against the impugned order-in-appeal, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal within the stipulated window period for filing the appeal with statutory pre-deposit. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
APARESH KUMAR SINGH, CJ G.M.MOHIUDDIN, J
02.12.2025 vs
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.