SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 35904

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
A Venkat Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 32965/2025



IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.32965 of 2025 Dated: 28.11.2025 Between:

A.Venkat Reddy and another … Petitioners And The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department and six others … Respondents

ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:-

“… to issue any order or direction, Writ or Writs, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the impugned endorsement letter No.A2/104/2025 dated 15.03.2025, issued by the 3rd respondent herein is illegal, arbitrary, malafide and non-application of mind and violation of the principles of natural justice and set aside the same in the interest of justice and equity and consequently direct the Respondent No.2 to 7 to conduct the survey and fix the boundaries with plan and sketch by showing sub-division survey numbers in pursuance of the online application Nos. DERO/22401100738 and DERO/22401100730 dated 10.08. 2024 in survey nos.325/2B (Ac.4-23 gts.), 406/1 (Ac.0-39 gts.), 406/4 (Ac.4-25 gts.), 406/4B (Ac.1-12 gts.), 407/1 (Ac.4-04 gts.), and 406/2(Ac.0.20 gts) 406/2B (Ac. 2-20 gts) situated at Adloor Village, Kamareddy Mandal and District and fix the boundaries in the interest of justice and equity and pass such other order or orders …”

2. Heard Mr.K.Vasanth Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue representing learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondents. Perused the record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners filed F-line application bearing Nos.DERO/22401100 738 and DERO/22401100730 dated 10.08.2024 before official respondents seeking to conduct sub-division survey pertaining to survey nos.325/2B (Ac.4-23 gts.), 406/1 (Ac.0-39 gts.), 406/4 (Ac.4-25 gts.), 406/4B (Ac.1-12 gts.), 407/1 (Ac.4-04 gts.), and 406/2(Ac.0.20 gts) 406/2B (Ac. 2-20 gts) situated at Adloor Village, Kamareddy Mandal and District and fix boundaries. But so far no survey is conducted and respondent No.3 vide impugned endorsement No.A2/104/2025 dated 15.02.2025 held as follows:-

“Further it is to inform that the then Inspector of Survey Kamareddy has attended the demarcation on 01.08.2024 vide this office file bearing No.A1/365/2023. Panchanama not conducted due to without Sub-Division of Sy.No.325, 406, 407 the demarcation could not be done. So, unable to issue Panchanama.

This is for information”.

Therefore, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks a direction to official respondents to pass appropriate orders.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, by filing the written instructions contended that the petitioners have already preferred W.P.No.23442 of 2024 and W.P.No.35195 of 2024 seeking the very same relief before this Court; that W.P.No.23442 of 2024 was disposed of on 19.09.2024 and W.P.No.35195 of 2024 was disposed of on 20.03.2025; that by suppressing the said facts, the petitioners filed the present Writ Petition.

5. He further contends that in compliance of the order dated 20.03.2025 passed by this Court in earlier W.P.No.35195 of 2024, notices were already issued to the parties concerned for conducting survey on 05.12.2025. Since, the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, learned counsel seeks to dismiss this Writ Petition.

6. Having regard to the submissions of both the learned counsel and upon considering the fact that survey with respect to the subject lands is purported to be conducted on 05.12.2025, this Court does not see any reason or ground to keep this Writ Petition pending any further.

7. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands closed. No costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed.

_____________________ E.V.VENUGOPAL, J

28.11.2025

ESP

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top